Reasons for action, acting for reasons, and rationality

Maria Alvarez*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
673 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

What kind of thing is a reason for action? What is it to act for a reason? And what is the connection between acting for a reason and rationality? There is controversy about the many issues raised by these questions. In this paper I shall answer the first question with a conception of practical reasons that I call ‘Factualism’, which says that all reasons are facts. I defend this conception against its main rival, Psychologism, which says that practical reasons are mental states or mental facts, and also against a variant of Factualism that says that some practical reasons are facts and others are false beliefs. I argue that the conception of practical reasons defended here (i) provides plausible answers to the second and third questions above; and (ii) gives a more unified and satisfactory picture of practical reasons than those offered by its rivals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3293-3310
Number of pages18
JournalSYNTHESE
Volume195
Issue number8
Early online date25 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Acting for reasons
  • Facts
  • Motivating and explanatory reasons
  • Normative
  • Psychologism
  • Rationality
  • Reasons

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasons for action, acting for reasons, and rationality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this