Reducing conflict and containment rates on acute psychiatric wards: The Safewards cluster randomised controlled trial

Len Bowers*, Karen James, Alan Quirk, Alan Simpson, Duncan Stewart, John Hodsoll

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

254 Citations (Scopus)
449 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute psychiatric wards manage patients whose actions may threaten safety (conflict). Staff act to avert or minimise harm (containment). The Safe wards model enabled the identification of ten interventions to reduce the frequency of both. 


OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of these interventions. DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with psychiatric hospitals and wards as the units of randomisation. The main outcomes were rates of conflict and containment. 


PARTICIPANTS: Staff and patients in 31 randomly chosen wards at 15 randomly chosen hospitals. 


RESULTS: For shifts with conflict or containment incidents, the experimental condition reduced the rate of conflict events by 15% (95% CI 5.6-23.7%) relative to the control intervention. The rate of containment events for the experimental intervention was reduced by 26.4% (95% CI 9.9-34.3%). 


CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions aiming to improve staff relationships with patients can reduce the frequency of conflict and containment. 


TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRSCTN38001825. Crown Copyright.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1412-1422
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume52
Issue number9
Early online date9 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2015

Keywords

  • Absconding
  • Inpatient
  • Psychiatry
  • Rapid tranquillisation
  • Restraint
  • Seclusion
  • Self harm
  • Special observation
  • Violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing conflict and containment rates on acute psychiatric wards: The Safewards cluster randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this