Regional Pulmonary Blood Flow: Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion and Phase-Contrast MR

Joshua F. P. van Amerom, Logi Vidarsson, Shengping Wu, Rogerio Tessler, Shi-Joon Yoo, Jaques Belik, Christopher K. Macgowan*, Joshua van Amerom

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regional pulmonary blood flow can be assessed using both dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR and phase-contrast (PC) MR. These methods provide somewhat complementary information: DCE MR can assess flow over the entire lung while PC MR can detect rapid changes in flow to a targeted region. Although both methods are considered accurate, one may be more feasible than the other depending on pathology, patient condition, and availability of an intravenous route. The objective of this study was to establish a consensus between the two methods by comparing paired DCE MR and PC MR measurements of relative blood flow in Yorkshire piglets (N = 5, age = 7 days, weight = 3.3 +/- 0.6 kg) under various physiological states including regional lung collapse. A strong correlation (R(2) = 0.71, P <0.01) was observed between the methods. In conclusion, DCE MR and PC MR provide a consistent measure of changes in regional pulmonary blood flow. Magn Reson Med 61:1249-1254, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1249-1254
Number of pages6
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
Volume61
Issue number5
Early online date27 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009

Keywords

  • pulmonary blood flow
  • pulmonary perfusion
  • atelectasis
  • porcine model
  • phase contrast
  • dynamic contrast enhanced angiography
  • MAGNETIC-RESONANCE
  • QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional Pulmonary Blood Flow: Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion and Phase-Contrast MR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this