TY - JOUR
T1 - ROAD2H
T2 - Development and evaluation of an open-source explainable artificial intelligence approach for managing co-morbidity and clinical guidelines
AU - Domínguez, Jesús
AU - Prociuk, Denys
AU - Marović, Branko
AU - Čyras, Kristijonas
AU - Cocarascu, Oana
AU - Ruiz, Francis
AU - Mi, Ella
AU - Mi, Emma
AU - Ramtale, Christian
AU - Rago, Antonio
AU - Darzi, Ara
AU - Toni, Francesca
AU - Curcin, Vasa
AU - Delaney, Brendan
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Global Challenges Research Fund grant ROAD2H: Resource Optimisation, Argumentation, Decision Support, and Knowledge Transfer to Create Value via Learning Health Systems (EP/P029558/1), the UK Research and Innovation, and Health Data Research UK. The authors gratefully acknowledge infrastructure support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of University of Michigan.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans. Methods: We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists. Results: Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise. Conclusion: An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.
AB - Introduction: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans. Methods: We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists. Results: Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise. Conclusion: An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.
KW - argumentation
KW - CDS hooks
KW - clinical decision support systems
KW - co-morbidity
KW - FHIR
KW - Transition-based Medical Recommendation model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170654120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lrh2.10391
DO - 10.1002/lrh2.10391
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85170654120
SN - 2379-6146
JO - Learning Health Systems
JF - Learning Health Systems
ER -