TY - JOUR
T1 - Scares, Panics, and Strategy
T2 - The Politics of Security and British Invasion Scares before 1914
AU - Morgan-Owen, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This work presented in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51208503).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022/9/29
Y1 - 2022/9/29
N2 - This study examines whether “invasion scares” before 1914 period had an impact on the course of British strategy. It shows that contemporary observers perceived a clear link between the ways in which British society depicted and understood issues of strategy and the ways in which the state could prepare for and conduct a future war. This was particularly so when it came to the language used to describe issues of security in Britain and the ideological consensus that these discourses reflected. The prominent place of discussions about how to defend the British Isles against invasion before 1914 therefore convinced some observers that Briton’s preoccupation with passive defence was rendering the nation vulnerable by robbing it of the capacity to adopt credible policies of deterrence and offensive action.
AB - This study examines whether “invasion scares” before 1914 period had an impact on the course of British strategy. It shows that contemporary observers perceived a clear link between the ways in which British society depicted and understood issues of strategy and the ways in which the state could prepare for and conduct a future war. This was particularly so when it came to the language used to describe issues of security in Britain and the ideological consensus that these discourses reflected. The prominent place of discussions about how to defend the British Isles against invasion before 1914 therefore convinced some observers that Briton’s preoccupation with passive defence was rendering the nation vulnerable by robbing it of the capacity to adopt credible policies of deterrence and offensive action.
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2022.2113255
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139209170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09592296.2022.2113255
DO - 10.1080/09592296.2022.2113255
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-2296
VL - 33
SP - 442
EP - 473
JO - DIPLOMACY AND STATECRAFT
JF - DIPLOMACY AND STATECRAFT
IS - 3
ER -