TY - JOUR
T1 - Scoping Review on the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Pediatric Disorders of Consciousness
AU - Molteni, Erika
AU - Canas, Liane dos Santos
AU - Briand, Marie Michèle
AU - Estraneo, Anna
AU - Font, Carolina Colomer
AU - Formisano, Rita
AU - Fufaeva, Ekaterina
AU - Gosseries, Olivia
AU - Howarth, Robyn A.
AU - Lanteri, Paola
AU - Licandro, Gimena Inès
AU - Magee, Wendy L.
AU - Veeramuthu, Vigneswaran
AU - Wilson, Pamela
AU - Yamaki, Tomohiro
AU - Slomine, Beth S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the funders for their financial support. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of the John Hopkins School of Medicine Library who provided a comprehensive list of terms for conducting the logic search into the databases.
Funding Information:
E. Molteni was funded by the Medical Research Council UK, under a Skills Development Fellowship Scheme. M.-M. Briand was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research and the Fonds de Recherche Québécois en Santé. L.S. S. Canas was funded in part by the Wellcome Trust (215010/Z/18/Z). O. Gosseries is research associate at F.R.S-FNRS. A. Estraneo, R. Formisano, and O. Gosseries were funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie (grant agreement 778234)-DoCMA project. A. Estraneo was also funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, Ricerca Corrente awarded to Fondazione don Gnocchi, for 2019-2021.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).
PY - 2023/8/8
Y1 - 2023/8/8
N2 - Background and Objectives: Comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of disorders of consciousness (DoC) in pediatric patients have not yet been released. We aimed to summarize available evidence for DoC with >14 days duration to support the future development of guidelines for children, adolescents and young adults aged 6 months-18 years. Methods: This scoping review was reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search identified records from 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Abstracts received 3 blind reviews. Corresponding full-text articles rated as "in-scope"and reporting data not published in any other retained article (i.e., no double reporting) were identified and assigned to 5 thematic evaluating teams. Full-text articles were reviewed using a double-blind standardized form. Level of evidence was graded, and summative statements were generated. Results: On November 9, 2022, 2,167 documents had been identified; 132 articles were retained, of which 33 (25%) were published over the past 5 years. Overall, 2,161 individuals met the inclusion criteria; female patients were 527 of 1,554 (33.9%) cases included, whose sex was identifiable. Of 132 articles, 57 (43.2%) were single case reports and only 5 (3.8%) clinical trials; the level of evidence was prevalently low (80/132; 60.6%). Most studies included neurobehavioral measures (84/127; 66.1%) and neuroimaging (81/127; 63.8%); 59 (46.5%) were mainly related to diagnosis, 56 (44.1%) to prognosis, and 44 (34.6%) to treatment. Most frequently used neurobehavioral tools included the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Coma/Near-Coma Scale, Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale, and Post-Acute Level of Consciousness scale. EEG, event-related potentials, structural CT, and MRI were the most frequently used instrumental techniques. In 29/53 (54.7%) cases, DoC improvement was observed, which was associated with treatment with amantadine. Discussion: The literature on pediatric DoCs is mainly observational, and clinical details are either inconsistently presented or absent. Conclusions drawn from many studies convey insubstantial evidence and have limited validity and low potential for translation in clinical practice. Despite these limitations, our work summarizes the extant literature and constitutes a base for future guidelines related to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pediatric DoC.
AB - Background and Objectives: Comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of disorders of consciousness (DoC) in pediatric patients have not yet been released. We aimed to summarize available evidence for DoC with >14 days duration to support the future development of guidelines for children, adolescents and young adults aged 6 months-18 years. Methods: This scoping review was reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search identified records from 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Abstracts received 3 blind reviews. Corresponding full-text articles rated as "in-scope"and reporting data not published in any other retained article (i.e., no double reporting) were identified and assigned to 5 thematic evaluating teams. Full-text articles were reviewed using a double-blind standardized form. Level of evidence was graded, and summative statements were generated. Results: On November 9, 2022, 2,167 documents had been identified; 132 articles were retained, of which 33 (25%) were published over the past 5 years. Overall, 2,161 individuals met the inclusion criteria; female patients were 527 of 1,554 (33.9%) cases included, whose sex was identifiable. Of 132 articles, 57 (43.2%) were single case reports and only 5 (3.8%) clinical trials; the level of evidence was prevalently low (80/132; 60.6%). Most studies included neurobehavioral measures (84/127; 66.1%) and neuroimaging (81/127; 63.8%); 59 (46.5%) were mainly related to diagnosis, 56 (44.1%) to prognosis, and 44 (34.6%) to treatment. Most frequently used neurobehavioral tools included the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Coma/Near-Coma Scale, Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale, and Post-Acute Level of Consciousness scale. EEG, event-related potentials, structural CT, and MRI were the most frequently used instrumental techniques. In 29/53 (54.7%) cases, DoC improvement was observed, which was associated with treatment with amantadine. Discussion: The literature on pediatric DoCs is mainly observational, and clinical details are either inconsistently presented or absent. Conclusions drawn from many studies convey insubstantial evidence and have limited validity and low potential for translation in clinical practice. Despite these limitations, our work summarizes the extant literature and constitutes a base for future guidelines related to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pediatric DoC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85167428592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207473
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207473
M3 - Article
C2 - 37308301
AN - SCOPUS:85167428592
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 101
SP - E581-E593
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 6
ER -