Sex Affects the Relationship Between Third Party Punishment and Cooperation

Claudia Rodriguez-Ruiz, José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes, Marta Iglesias-Julios, Santiago Sanchez-Pages, Enrique Turiegano*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prosocial third-party punishment (3PP) is a punitive behavior against antisocial individuals, which might explain extended cooperativeness in humans. 3PP shows sexual dimorphism, being more frequent in men than in women. We studied whether sexually dimorphic features related to sexual hormones during development (facial dimorphism and 2D:4D) influence the tendency to engage in 3PP in a sample of 511 women and 328 men. After playing a Prisoner’s Dilemma, participants had to decide whether to penalize the defection of a third player who had exploited his/her counterpart’s cooperation. In line with previous studies, we observe that men are more prone to engage in 3PP than women. We find that this sex difference is due to cooperative men being more likely to punish than cooperative women. In addition, men with higher facial masculinity are less likely to engage in 3PP, whereas no features influence 3PP in women. We discuss the possibility that sex differences in the motivations and fitness implications underlying 3PP might be driving the observed results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4288
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Affects the Relationship Between Third Party Punishment and Cooperation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this