Social accountability and community forest management: the failure of collaborative governance in the Wombat Forest

Nate Matthews, Bruce Missingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents a critical analysis of what caused the failure of Australia’s first Community Forest Management (CFM) trial. We explore how ‘community’ was conceptualised and represented through the dynamic CFM process, leading to contradictions and conflicts that could not be resolved. We examine the governance structures and institutions that were created to try to enable community participation in forest management. Ambiguity and uncertainty in the power and purpose of the CFM organisation, as well as power relationships within the organisation, all contributed to conflicts that eventually tore the CFM process apart.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberNA
Pages (from-to)1052-1063
Number of pages12
JournalDevelopment in Practice
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social accountability and community forest management: the failure of collaborative governance in the Wombat Forest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this