Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Benchmarks and Results from a Wide Range of Numerical Algorithms

J LeBlanc, A Antipov, F Becca, I Bulik, G Chan, Chia-Min Chung, Youjin Deng, Michel Ferrero, T Henderson, Carlos Jiménez-Hoyos, Evgeny Kozik, Xuan-Wen Liu, Andrew Millis, Nikolay Prokofiev, Mingpu Qin, Gustavo Scuseria, Hao Shi, Boris Svistunov, Luca Tocchio, Igor TupitsynSteven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, Bo-Xiao Zheng, Zhenyue Zhu, Emanuel Gull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

446 Citations (Scopus)
194 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Numerical results for ground state and excited state properties (energies, double occupancies, and Matsubara-axis self energies) of the single-orbital Hubbard model on a two-dimensional square lattice are presented, in order to provide an assessment of our ability to compute accurate results in the thermodynamic limit. Many methods are employed, including auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo, bare and bold-line diagrammatic Monte Carlo, method of dual fermions, density matrix embedding theory, density matrix renormalization group, dynamical cluster approximation, diffusion Monte Carlo within a fixed node approximation, unrestricted coupled cluster theory, and multi-reference projected Hartree-Fock. Comparison of results obtained by different methods allows for the identification of uncertainties and systematic errors. The importance of extrapolation to converged thermodynamic limit values is emphasized. Cases where agreement between different methods is obtained establish benchmark results that may be useful in the validation of new approaches and the improvement of existing methods.
Original languageEnglish
Article number041041
Pages (from-to)041041-1-041041-28
JournalPhysical Review X
Volume5
Early online date14 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Benchmarks and Results from a Wide Range of Numerical Algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this