Standalone balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Indications and outcomes from the UK in the transcatheter valve era

Muhammed Z. Khawaja, Manav Sohal, Haseeb Valli, Rafal Dworakowski, Stephen J. Pettit, David Roy, James Newton, Heiko Schneider, Ganesh Manoharan, Sagar Doshi, Douglas Muir, David Roberts, James Nolan, Mark Gunning, Cameron Densem, Mark S. Spence, Saqib Chowdhary, Vaikom S. Mahadevan, Stephen J. Brecker, Philip MacCarthyMichael Mullen, Rodney H. Stables, Bernard D. Prendergast, Adam de Belder, Martyn Thomas, Simon Redwood, David Hildick-Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives 
We sought to characterize UK-wide balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) experience in the TAVI era. 

Background 
BAV for acquired calcific aortic stenosis is in a phase of renaissance, largely due to the development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). 

Methods 
Data from 423 patients at 14 centers across the UK were analyzed. 

Results 
Patients were aged 80.9 +/- 9.5 years; 52.5% were male. Mean logistic EuroScore was 27.3% +/- 16.8%. Mean peak transaortic gradient fell from 62.0 +/- 26.3 to 28.3 +/- 16.2 mm Hg. Aortic valve area increased from 0.58 +/- 0.19 to 0.80 +/- 0.25 cm2 echocardiographically. Procedural complication rate was 6.3%, comprising death (2.4%), blood transfusion 2 U (1.2%), cardiac tamponade (1.0%), stroke (1.0%), vascular surgical repair (1.0%), coronary embolism (0.5%), and permanent pacemaker (0.2%). Mortality was 13.8% at 30 days and 36.3% at 12 months. Subsequently, 18.3% of patients underwent TAVI and 7.0% sAVR, with improved survival compared to those who had no further intervention (logrank <0.0001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that survival was adversely effected by the presence of coronary artery disease (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.082.17, P = 0.018), poor LV function (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.092.16, P = 0.014), and either urgent (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.182.45; P = 0.004) or emergent presentation (HR 3.72, 95%CI 2.276.08; P <0.0001). 

Conclusion 
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty offers good immediate hemodynamic efficacy at an acceptable risk of major complications. Medium-term prognosis is poor in the absence of definitive therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-373
Number of pages8
JournalCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Keywords

  • aortic stenosis
  • balloon aortic valvuloplasty
  • PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
  • LONG-TERM SURVIVAL
  • ELDERLY PATIENTS
  • HIGH-RISK
  • ARTERY-DISEASE
  • BONE-FORMATION
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • STENOSIS
  • IMPLANTATION
  • REGISTRY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standalone balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Indications and outcomes from the UK in the transcatheter valve era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this