TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing and Not Testing for Coronavirus on Twitter
T2 - Surfacing Testing Situations Across Scales With Interpretative Methods
AU - Marres, Noortje
AU - Colombo, Gabriele
AU - Bounegru, Liliana
AU - Gray, Jonathan W. Y.
AU - Gerlitz, Carolin
AU - Tripp, James
N1 - Funding Information:
We want to acknowledge the important contributions to this study by the participants in the following workshops: the virtual workshop on “COVID-19 testing on Twitter: Surfacing testing situations beyond the laboratory,” co-organized by the Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies (University of Warwick), the Department of Digital Humanities (King’s College London), and the Public Data Lab (22–23 June 2020); the online workshop at the Digital Methods Initiative Summer School, University of Amsterdam (July 2020); and the hybrid workshop “Test Society/Covid-19” hosted by Media of Cooperation, University of Siegen (December 2021). We owe some of our insights in and formulations of Covid testing situations to Helena Suarez Val who also improved the Le-CAT software, as well as our understanding of it. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work has been funded by the Univerisity of Warwick’s Global Research Priorities Fund as well as by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Project-ID 262513311—SFB 1187.
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work has been funded by the Univerisity of Warwick’s Global Research Priorities Fund as well as by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Project-ID 262513311—SFB 1187.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/9/21
Y1 - 2023/9/21
N2 - How was testing—and not testing—for coronavirus articulated as a testing situation on social media in the Spring of 2020? Our study examines everyday situations of Covid-19 testing by analyzing a large corpus of Twitter data collected during the first 2 months of the pandemic. Adopting a sociological definition of testing situations, as moments in which it is no longer possible to go on in the usual way, we show how social media analysis can be used to surface a range of such situations across scales, from the individual to the societal. Practicing a form of large-scale data exploration we call “interpretative querying” within the framework of situational analysis, we delineated two types of coronavirus testing situations: those involving locations of testing and those involving relations. Using lexicon analysis and composite image analysis, we then determined what composes the two types of testing situations on Twitter during the relevant period. Our analysis shows that contrary to the focus on individual responsibility in UK government discourse on Covid-19 testing, English-language Twitter reporting on coronavirus testing at the time thematized collective relations. By a variety of means, including in-memoriam portraits and infographics, this discourse rendered explicit challenges to societal relations and arrangements arising from situations of testing and not testing for Covid-19 and highlighted the multifaceted ways in which situations of corona testing amplified asymmetrical distributions of harms and benefits between different social groupings, and between citizens and state, during the first months of the pandemic.
AB - How was testing—and not testing—for coronavirus articulated as a testing situation on social media in the Spring of 2020? Our study examines everyday situations of Covid-19 testing by analyzing a large corpus of Twitter data collected during the first 2 months of the pandemic. Adopting a sociological definition of testing situations, as moments in which it is no longer possible to go on in the usual way, we show how social media analysis can be used to surface a range of such situations across scales, from the individual to the societal. Practicing a form of large-scale data exploration we call “interpretative querying” within the framework of situational analysis, we delineated two types of coronavirus testing situations: those involving locations of testing and those involving relations. Using lexicon analysis and composite image analysis, we then determined what composes the two types of testing situations on Twitter during the relevant period. Our analysis shows that contrary to the focus on individual responsibility in UK government discourse on Covid-19 testing, English-language Twitter reporting on coronavirus testing at the time thematized collective relations. By a variety of means, including in-memoriam portraits and infographics, this discourse rendered explicit challenges to societal relations and arrangements arising from situations of testing and not testing for Covid-19 and highlighted the multifaceted ways in which situations of corona testing amplified asymmetrical distributions of harms and benefits between different social groupings, and between citizens and state, during the first months of the pandemic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171986982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/20563051231196538
DO - 10.1177/20563051231196538
M3 - Article
SN - 2056-3051
VL - 9
JO - Social Media + Society
JF - Social Media + Society
IS - 3
ER -