TY - JOUR
T1 - The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI)
T2 - a multicentre case-control study
AU - EU-GEI WP2 Group
AU - Di Forti, Marta
AU - Quattrone, Diego
AU - Freeman, Tom P.
AU - Tripoli, Giada
AU - Gayer-Anderson, Charlotte
AU - Quigley, Harriet
AU - Rodriguez, Victoria
AU - Jongsma, Hannah E.
AU - Ferraro, Laura
AU - La Cascia, Caterina
AU - La Barbera, Daniele
AU - Tarricone, Ilaria
AU - Berardi, Domenico
AU - Szöke, Andrei
AU - Arango, Celso
AU - Tortelli, Andrea
AU - Velthorst, Eva
AU - Bernardo, Miguel
AU - Del-Ben, Cristina Marta
AU - Menezes, Paulo Rossi
AU - Selten, Jean Paul
AU - Jones, Peter B.
AU - Kirkbride, James B.
AU - Rutten, Bart PF
AU - de Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Sham, Pak C.
AU - van Os, Jim
AU - Lewis, Cathryn M.
AU - Lynskey, Michael
AU - Morgan, Craig
AU - Murray, Robin M.
AU - Amoretti, Silvia
AU - Arrojo, Manuel
AU - Baudin, Grégoire
AU - Beards, Stephanie
AU - Bernardo, Miquel
AU - Bobes, Julio
AU - Bonetto, Chiara
AU - Cabrera, Bibiana
AU - Carracedo, Angel
AU - Charpeaud, Thomas
AU - Costas, Javier
AU - Cristofalo, Doriana
AU - Cuadrado, Pedro
AU - Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M.
AU - Ferchiou, Aziz
AU - Franke, Nathalie
AU - Frijda, Flora
AU - Hubbard, Kathryn
AU - Stilo, Simona A.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 -
Background: Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of later psychotic disorder but whether it affects incidence of the disorder remains unclear. We aimed to identify patterns of cannabis use with the strongest effect on odds of psychotic disorder across Europe and explore whether differences in such patterns contribute to variations in the incidence rates of psychotic disorder. Methods: We included patients aged 18–64 years who presented to psychiatric services in 11 sites across Europe and Brazil with first-episode psychosis and recruited controls representative of the local populations. We applied adjusted logistic regression models to the data to estimate which patterns of cannabis use carried the highest odds for psychotic disorder. Using Europe-wide and national data on the expected concentration of Δ
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the different types of cannabis available across the sites, we divided the types of cannabis used by participants into two categories: low potency (THC <10%) and high potency (THC ≥10%). Assuming causality, we calculated the population attributable fractions (PAFs) for the patterns of cannabis use associated with the highest odds of psychosis and the correlation between such patterns and the incidence rates for psychotic disorder across the study sites. Findings: Between May 1, 2010, and April 1, 2015, we obtained data from 901 patients with first-episode psychosis across 11 sites and 1237 population controls from those same sites. Daily cannabis use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·2, 95% CI 2·2–4·1), increasing to nearly five-times increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis (4·8, 2·5–6·3). The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12·2% (95% CI 3·0–16·1) of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30·3% (15·2–40·0) in London and 50·3% (27·4–66·0) in Amsterdam. The adjusted incident rates for psychotic disorder were positively correlated with the prevalence in controls across the 11 sites of use of high-potency cannabis (r = 0·7; p=0·0286) and daily use (r = 0·8; p=0·0109). Interpretation: Differences in frequency of daily cannabis use and in use of high-potency cannabis contributed to the striking variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across the 11 studied sites. Given the increasing availability of high-potency cannabis, this has important implications for public health. Funding source: Medical Research Council, the European Community's Seventh Framework Program grant, São Paulo Research Foundation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and the NIHR BRC at University College London, Wellcome Trust.
AB -
Background: Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of later psychotic disorder but whether it affects incidence of the disorder remains unclear. We aimed to identify patterns of cannabis use with the strongest effect on odds of psychotic disorder across Europe and explore whether differences in such patterns contribute to variations in the incidence rates of psychotic disorder. Methods: We included patients aged 18–64 years who presented to psychiatric services in 11 sites across Europe and Brazil with first-episode psychosis and recruited controls representative of the local populations. We applied adjusted logistic regression models to the data to estimate which patterns of cannabis use carried the highest odds for psychotic disorder. Using Europe-wide and national data on the expected concentration of Δ
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the different types of cannabis available across the sites, we divided the types of cannabis used by participants into two categories: low potency (THC <10%) and high potency (THC ≥10%). Assuming causality, we calculated the population attributable fractions (PAFs) for the patterns of cannabis use associated with the highest odds of psychosis and the correlation between such patterns and the incidence rates for psychotic disorder across the study sites. Findings: Between May 1, 2010, and April 1, 2015, we obtained data from 901 patients with first-episode psychosis across 11 sites and 1237 population controls from those same sites. Daily cannabis use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·2, 95% CI 2·2–4·1), increasing to nearly five-times increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis (4·8, 2·5–6·3). The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12·2% (95% CI 3·0–16·1) of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30·3% (15·2–40·0) in London and 50·3% (27·4–66·0) in Amsterdam. The adjusted incident rates for psychotic disorder were positively correlated with the prevalence in controls across the 11 sites of use of high-potency cannabis (r = 0·7; p=0·0286) and daily use (r = 0·8; p=0·0109). Interpretation: Differences in frequency of daily cannabis use and in use of high-potency cannabis contributed to the striking variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across the 11 studied sites. Given the increasing availability of high-potency cannabis, this has important implications for public health. Funding source: Medical Research Council, the European Community's Seventh Framework Program grant, São Paulo Research Foundation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and the NIHR BRC at University College London, Wellcome Trust.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064313484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3
DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 30902669
AN - SCOPUS:85064313484
SN - 2215-0366
VL - 6
SP - 427
EP - 436
JO - The Lancet Psychiatry
JF - The Lancet Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -