TY - JOUR
T1 - The International Political Economy of the Middle-income Trap
AU - Naseemullah, Adnan
N1 - Funding Information:
For their comments, advice and criticisms, I would like to thank Amit Ahuja, Caroline Arnold, Catherine Boone, Jennifer Brass, Jonathan Chow, David Collier, Peter Kingstone, James Kurth, Jody LaPorte, Darius Ornston, Natalya Naqvi, Jessica Rich, Herman Schwartz, Paul Segal, Pon Souvannaseng, Paul Staniland, Andrew Sumner, two anonymous reviewers and the editors of JDS. Earlier versions of this paper were presented in seminars at King’s College London, Oxford University, and at the American Political Science Association and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics annual meetings.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/7/26
Y1 - 2022/7/26
N2 - Developing countries face uncertain trajectories for growth in the twenty-first century, with many finding themselves a ‘middle-income trap’. Extant theories in the politics of development that focus on domestic institutional strength and weakness represent necessary but not fully sufficient explanations for the trajectories of middle-income countries. In order to explain uncertain and uneven development outcomes in an era of heightened globalisation, this article seeks to explore the impact of international institutions, specifically the post-Cold War structures of trade and investment and global value chains, on the possibilities for growth for middle-income countries. The particular character of rules and norms defining trade and investment and the power dynamics behind their design suggest that international institutions as well as domestic factors explain disappointing and increasingly unequal development outcomes among middle-income countries.
AB - Developing countries face uncertain trajectories for growth in the twenty-first century, with many finding themselves a ‘middle-income trap’. Extant theories in the politics of development that focus on domestic institutional strength and weakness represent necessary but not fully sufficient explanations for the trajectories of middle-income countries. In order to explain uncertain and uneven development outcomes in an era of heightened globalisation, this article seeks to explore the impact of international institutions, specifically the post-Cold War structures of trade and investment and global value chains, on the possibilities for growth for middle-income countries. The particular character of rules and norms defining trade and investment and the power dynamics behind their design suggest that international institutions as well as domestic factors explain disappointing and increasingly unequal development outcomes among middle-income countries.
KW - developing
KW - economic growth
KW - Foreign direct investment
KW - industrial development
KW - institutions
KW - state
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135131896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00220388.2022.2096440
DO - 10.1080/00220388.2022.2096440
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135131896
SN - 0022-0388
VL - 58
SP - 2154
EP - 2171
JO - JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
JF - JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
IS - 10
ER -