The Lancet's risky ideas? Rights, interests and home-birth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis on home-births reported a small increase in neonatal infant mortality but considerable reduction in maternal morbidity in association with planned home-birth as compared with hospital-birth (1). This caused the editors of the Lancet to proclaim that '[w]omen have the right to choose how and where to give birth, but they do not have the right to put their baby at risk. There are competing interests that need to be weighed carefully' (2).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)918 - 920
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume65
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Lancet's risky ideas? Rights, interests and home-birth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this