The role of inflammatory biomarkers in developing targeted cardiovascular therapies: Lessons from the cardiovascular inflammation reduction trials

Anti-inflammatory add-on therapy to conventional cardiovascular prophylaxis has been proposed as a novel therapeutic approach to potentially reduce residual cardiovascular risk. This hypothesis has been challenged by a series of unsuccessful Phase III studies testing the impact on clinical outcomes of novel agents with immunomodulatory actions. Specifically, the apparent ability of phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂) inhibitors and of antioxidants to ameliorate inflammation and to reduce coronary disease in Phase II trials did not translate into improved secondary cardiovascular prevention in larger population-based studies. Other anti-inflammatory agents are still under scrutiny. However, studies to date have lacked information on the inflammatory profile of the participants, both at baseline and at follow-up, thereby limiting the possibility of identifying subgroups of patients in whom 'residual inflammation' can be detected despite optimal conventional therapy, and who could therefore benefit from a cardiovascular prevention strategy specifically targeting inflammation. This has also rendered it difficult to interpret the results as a conclusive demonstration of inefficacy of the tested anti-inflammatory strategies in the treatment of atherosclerosis. We here discuss the importance of better patient characterization to minimize heterogeneity of the study population, so that effectiveness of different anti-inflammatory strategies can be evaluated in targeted subgroups of patients. We also illustrate how specific inflammatory biomarkers could assist in this process, with particular emphasis on the roles of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and circulating monocyte phenotype.