TY - JOUR
T1 - The Variational Quantum Eigensolver
T2 - A review of methods and best practices
AU - Tilly, Jules
AU - Chen, Hongxiang
AU - Cao, Shuxiang
AU - Picozzi, Dario
AU - Setia, Kanav
AU - Li, Ying
AU - Grant, Edward
AU - Wossnig, Leonard
AU - Rungger, Ivan
AU - Booth, George H.
AU - Tennyson, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
J. Tilly is supported by an industrial CASE (iCASE) studentship, funded by and UK EPSRC [EP/R513143/1], in collaboration with University College London and Odyssey Therapeutics. H.C. is supported through a Teaching Fellowship from UCL. D.P. is supported by an industrial CASE (iCASE) studentship, funded by and UK EPSRC [EP/T517793/1], in collaboration with University College London and Odyssey Therapeutics. Y.L. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11875050 and 12088101) and NSAF, China (Grant No. U1930403). E.G. is supported by the UK EPSRC [EP/P510270/1]. L.W. is an honorary research fellow at the Department of Computer Science, University College London. I.R. acknowledges the support of the UK government department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy through the UK National Quantum Technologies Programme. G.H.B. gratefully acknowledges support from the Royal Society via a University Research Fellowship, United Kingdom, as well as funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 759063).
Funding Information:
J. Tilly is supported by an industrial CASE (iCASE) studentship, funded by and UK EPSRC [ EP/R513143/1 ], in collaboration with University College London and Odyssey Therapeutics. H.C. is supported through a Teaching Fellowship from UCL . D.P. is supported by an industrial CASE (iCASE) studentship, funded by and UK EPSRC [ EP/T517793/1 ], in collaboration with University College London and Odyssey Therapeutics. Y.L. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11875050 and 12088101 ) and NSAF, China (Grant No. U1930403 ). E.G. is supported by the UK EPSRC [ EP/P510270/1 ]. L.W. is an honorary research fellow at the Department of Computer Science, University College London. I.R. acknowledges the support of the UK government department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy through the UK National Quantum Technologies Programme. G.H.B. gratefully acknowledges support from the Royal Society via a University Research Fellowship, United Kingdom , as well as funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 759063 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/11/5
Y1 - 2022/11/5
N2 - The variational quantum eigensolver (or VQE), first developed by Peruzzo et al. (2014), has received significant attention from the research community in recent years. It uses the variational principle to compute the ground state energy of a Hamiltonian, a problem that is central to quantum chemistry and condensed matter physics. Conventional computing methods are constrained in their accuracy due to the computational limits facing exact modeling of the exponentially growing electronic wavefunction for these many-electron systems. The VQE may be used to model these complex wavefunctions in polynomial time, making it one of the most promising near-term applications for quantum computing. One important advantage is that variational algorithms have been shown to present some degree of resilience to the noise in the quantum hardware. Finding a path to navigate the relevant literature has rapidly become an overwhelming task, with many methods promising to improve different parts of the algorithm, but without clear descriptions of how the diverse parts fit together. The potential practical advantages of the algorithm are also widely discussed in the literature, but with varying conclusions. Despite strong theoretical underpinnings suggesting excellent scaling of individual VQE components, studies have pointed out that their various pre-factors could be too large to reach a quantum computing advantage over conventional methods. This review aims at disentangling the relevant literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the progress that has been made on the different parts of the algorithm, and to discuss future areas of research that are fundamental for the VQE to deliver on its promises. All the different components of the algorithm are reviewed in detail. These include the representation of Hamiltonians and wavefunctions on a quantum computer, the optimization process to find ground state energies, the post processing mitigation of quantum errors, and suggested best practices. We identify four main areas of future research: (1) optimal measurement schemes for reduction of circuit repetitions required; (2) large scale parallelization across many quantum computers; (3) ways to overcome the potential appearance of vanishing gradients in the optimization process for large systems, and how the number of iterations required for the optimization scales with system size; (4) the extent to which VQE suffers for quantum noise, and whether this noise can be mitigated in a tractable manner. The answers to these open research questions will determine the routes for the VQE to achieve quantum advantage as the quantum computing hardware scales up and as the noise levels are reduced.
AB - The variational quantum eigensolver (or VQE), first developed by Peruzzo et al. (2014), has received significant attention from the research community in recent years. It uses the variational principle to compute the ground state energy of a Hamiltonian, a problem that is central to quantum chemistry and condensed matter physics. Conventional computing methods are constrained in their accuracy due to the computational limits facing exact modeling of the exponentially growing electronic wavefunction for these many-electron systems. The VQE may be used to model these complex wavefunctions in polynomial time, making it one of the most promising near-term applications for quantum computing. One important advantage is that variational algorithms have been shown to present some degree of resilience to the noise in the quantum hardware. Finding a path to navigate the relevant literature has rapidly become an overwhelming task, with many methods promising to improve different parts of the algorithm, but without clear descriptions of how the diverse parts fit together. The potential practical advantages of the algorithm are also widely discussed in the literature, but with varying conclusions. Despite strong theoretical underpinnings suggesting excellent scaling of individual VQE components, studies have pointed out that their various pre-factors could be too large to reach a quantum computing advantage over conventional methods. This review aims at disentangling the relevant literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the progress that has been made on the different parts of the algorithm, and to discuss future areas of research that are fundamental for the VQE to deliver on its promises. All the different components of the algorithm are reviewed in detail. These include the representation of Hamiltonians and wavefunctions on a quantum computer, the optimization process to find ground state energies, the post processing mitigation of quantum errors, and suggested best practices. We identify four main areas of future research: (1) optimal measurement schemes for reduction of circuit repetitions required; (2) large scale parallelization across many quantum computers; (3) ways to overcome the potential appearance of vanishing gradients in the optimization process for large systems, and how the number of iterations required for the optimization scales with system size; (4) the extent to which VQE suffers for quantum noise, and whether this noise can be mitigated in a tractable manner. The answers to these open research questions will determine the routes for the VQE to achieve quantum advantage as the quantum computing hardware scales up and as the noise levels are reduced.
KW - Electronic structure
KW - Many-body physics
KW - Noisy intermediate scale quantum devices
KW - Quantum chemistry
KW - Quantum computing
KW - Variational methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138335876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85138335876
SN - 0370-1573
VL - 986
SP - 1
EP - 128
JO - Physics Reports
JF - Physics Reports
ER -