Abstract
Is it anachronistic to talk about racism in Hobbes? After all, racism is usually seen as biological: the disliked group must have innate characteristics which are inherited biologically. This is mostly said to be a modern idea. Yet biological racism can be found in medieval and early modern times, as with the Spanish doctrine of limpieza de sangre (cleanliness/purity of blood). Racism, including biological racism, was much more common in Hobbes’s England than we might think, including in texts he may have read; the language of race was hardly uncommon either. Moreover, someone can be called a racist whether or not their dislike of a group is based on characteristics of a group that are inherited biologically, I argue. Whether Hobbes was a racist remains open to debate; this paper offers evidence both for and against that proposition. But we should not reject the question of Hobbes’s racism as anachronistic.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 9-27 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Hobbes Studies |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 30 Mar 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Jun 2023 |
Keywords
- anachronism
- state of nature
- Native Americans
- cultural racism
- biological racism