Why Didn’t Slaves Revolt More Often During the Middle Passage?

Andrew Marcum, David Skarbek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
2069 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Given the substantial suffering of enslavement, why didn’t more slaves revolt during the Middle Passage of the Atlantic Slave Trade? We argue that the collective action problem was an important impediment to revolt. Revolts nearly always resulted in slave casualties, and crews tortured and killed conspirators. Overthrowing the crew benefited all of the slaves, so each slave had an incentive to free ride on others’ efforts to secure freedom. Using a rational choice perspective, we argue that slaves could more effectively overcome the collective action problem when there were fewer slaves aboard, fewer male slaves, and when the slaves were more homogenous. Data on slave voyages from 1750 to 1775 and archival and historical documents support these claims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-262
Number of pages27
JournalRATIONALITY AND SOCIETY
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Didn’t Slaves Revolt More Often During the Middle Passage?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this