Abstract
This paper presents an account of the nature of desire, informed by psychology and neuroscience, which entails that hunger is not a desire. The account is contrasted with Schroeder’s well-known empirically-informed theory of desire. It is argued that one significant virtue of the present account, in comparison with Schroeder’s theory, is that it draws a sharp distinction between desires and basic drives, such as the drive for food. One reason to draw this distinction is that experiments on incentive learning show that desires and basic drives influence action in different ways.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 617-635 |
Journal | REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 27 Feb 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |