10 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Commonly adopted in the manufacturing and aerospace sectors, digital twin (DT) platforms are increasingly seen as a promising paradigm to control, monitor, and analyze software-based, 'open', communication systems that are expected to dominate 6G deployments. Notably, DT platforms provide a sandbox in which to test artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for communication systems, potentially reducing the need to collect data and test algorithms in the field, i.e., on the physical twin (PT). A key challenge in the deployment of DT systems is to ensure that virtual control optimization, monitoring, and analysis at the DT are safe and reliable, avoiding incorrect decisions caused by 'model exploitation'. To address this challenge, this paper presents a general Bayesian framework with the aim of quantifying and accounting for model uncertainty at the DT that is caused by limitations in the amount and quality of data available at the DT from the PT. In the proposed framework, the DT builds a Bayesian model of the communication system, which is leveraged to enable core DT functionalities such as control via multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), monitoring of the PT for anomaly detection, prediction, data-collection optimization, and counterfactual analysis. To exemplify the application of the proposed framework, we specifically investigate a case-study system encompassing multiple sensing devices that report to a common receiver. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed Bayesian framework as compared to standard frequentist model-based solutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3146-3160
Number of pages15
JournalIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Volume41
Issue number10
Early online date30 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Bayesian Framework for Digital Twin-Based Control, Monitoring, and Data Collection in Wireless Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this