TY - JOUR
T1 - A new political economy of teacher development: England’s Teaching and Leadership Innovation Fund
AU - Ellis, Viv
AU - Mansell, Warwick
AU - Steadman, Sarah
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This article identifies new arrangements between the state and
non-state actors in the public sector, one that extends current
understandings of education privatisation, the transformation of
public services ‘by substitution’ and, specifically theories of the
‘shadow state’. Drawing on data from the Political Economy of
Teacher Education (PETE) project, the paper’s context is the current
situation of post-qualification teacher development in England and
its point of departure the Teaching and Leadership Innovation Fund
(TLIF) initiative, in the wider context of Conservative political interests in promoting ‘social mobility’ through enhancing ‘teacher
quality’. Through a political economy analysis of public records,
course information, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and
interviews, the paper offers an emerging typology of enterprises
to describe the organisations that won TLIF funding to provide
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for teachers in designated ‘Opportunity Areas’. Further, the paper extends available
theorisations of the shadow state by identifying three kinds of
shadow state structure – autonomous, intermediate and cocreated – in relation to CPD provision under TLIF. This provisional
identification is offered for critical examination beyond the immediate context of English CPD policy. The paper argues that these
different relations of power and interdependence represent a new
political economy of teacher development in England.
AB - This article identifies new arrangements between the state and
non-state actors in the public sector, one that extends current
understandings of education privatisation, the transformation of
public services ‘by substitution’ and, specifically theories of the
‘shadow state’. Drawing on data from the Political Economy of
Teacher Education (PETE) project, the paper’s context is the current
situation of post-qualification teacher development in England and
its point of departure the Teaching and Leadership Innovation Fund
(TLIF) initiative, in the wider context of Conservative political interests in promoting ‘social mobility’ through enhancing ‘teacher
quality’. Through a political economy analysis of public records,
course information, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and
interviews, the paper offers an emerging typology of enterprises
to describe the organisations that won TLIF funding to provide
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for teachers in designated ‘Opportunity Areas’. Further, the paper extends available
theorisations of the shadow state by identifying three kinds of
shadow state structure – autonomous, intermediate and cocreated – in relation to CPD provision under TLIF. This provisional
identification is offered for critical examination beyond the immediate context of English CPD policy. The paper argues that these
different relations of power and interdependence represent a new
political economy of teacher development in England.
U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2020.1717001
DO - 10.1080/02680939.2020.1717001
M3 - Article
SN - 0268-0939
VL - 36
SP - 605
JO - JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY
JF - JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY
IS - 5
ER -