TY - JOUR
T1 - Coherent risk measures alone are ineffective in constraining portfolio losses
AU - Armstrong, John
AU - Brigo, Damiano
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Professors Rita D'Ecclesia and Stavros Zenios for organizing this special issue in memory of Professor Giorgio Szego and his beloved wife Emilia. Damiano, in particular, fondly remembers many interesting discussions on risk measures, derivatives markets and the crisis with Giorgio, and he fondly remembers the Risk Measurement Summer School Giorgio founded and Rita took over later in Rome.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - We show that coherent risk measures alone are ineffective in curbing the behaviour of investors with limited liability or excessive tail-risk seeking behaviour if the market admits statistical arbitrage opportunities which we term ρ-arbitrage for a risk measure ρ. We show how to determine analytically whether such ρ-arbitrage portfolios exist in complete markets and in the Markowitz model. We also consider realistic numerical examples of incomplete markets and determine whether Expected-Shortfall arbitrage exists in these markets. We find that the answer depends heavily upon the probability model selected by the risk manager but that it is certainly possible for expected shortfall constraints to be ineffective in realistic markets. Since value at risk constraints are weaker than expected shortfall constraints, our results can be applied to value at risk.
AB - We show that coherent risk measures alone are ineffective in curbing the behaviour of investors with limited liability or excessive tail-risk seeking behaviour if the market admits statistical arbitrage opportunities which we term ρ-arbitrage for a risk measure ρ. We show how to determine analytically whether such ρ-arbitrage portfolios exist in complete markets and in the Markowitz model. We also consider realistic numerical examples of incomplete markets and determine whether Expected-Shortfall arbitrage exists in these markets. We find that the answer depends heavily upon the probability model selected by the risk manager but that it is certainly possible for expected shortfall constraints to be ineffective in realistic markets. Since value at risk constraints are weaker than expected shortfall constraints, our results can be applied to value at risk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115221425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106315
DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106315
M3 - Article
SN - 0378-4266
JO - Journal of Banking and Finance
JF - Journal of Banking and Finance
M1 - 106315
ER -