TY - JOUR
T1 - Commencing Technical Clinical Skills Training in the Early Stages of Medical Education
T2 - Exploring Student Views
AU - Seale, Josephine
AU - Knoetze, Madeleine
AU - Phung, Anita
AU - Prior, David
AU - Butchers, Colin
PY - 2019/3/15
Y1 - 2019/3/15
N2 - Introduction: Medical schools are increasingly introducing technical clinical skills training from year 1. However, little research has determined students’ views of such training. This study compared the perceptions of student groups which received different levels of technical skills training during the early years of their undergraduate medical degree. Methods: Medical students from King’s College London’s Stage curriculum (n = 184) receiving 48 h of technical skills teaching and Phase curriculum (n = 94), receiving 12 h, voluntarily participated. A mixed methods design using a questionnaire and focus groups explored students’ views. Stage and Phase student questionnaire responses were compared using Mann Whitney U tests. Focus group transcripts underwent thematic analysis. Results: The majority of Stage (n = 169) and Phase (n = 68) students identified year 1 as the best time to commence technical skills training. For the majority of the technical skills taught, Stage compared to Phase students reported feeling more prepared to perform them. Thematic analysis identified three main themes: Role of technical skills teaching in the early stages of medical education, impact on students’ learning and factors to consider when designing a medical undergraduate technical clinical skills programme. Conclusions: The wide student support and positive impact of technical skills training on students’ perceived preparedness for carrying out the techniques taught advocates its addition to the first year of the undergraduate medical curriculum. The identification by students of specific components considered to be fundamental in the effective teaching of technical skills provides guidance when designing future undergraduate clinical skills training.
AB - Introduction: Medical schools are increasingly introducing technical clinical skills training from year 1. However, little research has determined students’ views of such training. This study compared the perceptions of student groups which received different levels of technical skills training during the early years of their undergraduate medical degree. Methods: Medical students from King’s College London’s Stage curriculum (n = 184) receiving 48 h of technical skills teaching and Phase curriculum (n = 94), receiving 12 h, voluntarily participated. A mixed methods design using a questionnaire and focus groups explored students’ views. Stage and Phase student questionnaire responses were compared using Mann Whitney U tests. Focus group transcripts underwent thematic analysis. Results: The majority of Stage (n = 169) and Phase (n = 68) students identified year 1 as the best time to commence technical skills training. For the majority of the technical skills taught, Stage compared to Phase students reported feeling more prepared to perform them. Thematic analysis identified three main themes: Role of technical skills teaching in the early stages of medical education, impact on students’ learning and factors to consider when designing a medical undergraduate technical clinical skills programme. Conclusions: The wide student support and positive impact of technical skills training on students’ perceived preparedness for carrying out the techniques taught advocates its addition to the first year of the undergraduate medical curriculum. The identification by students of specific components considered to be fundamental in the effective teaching of technical skills provides guidance when designing future undergraduate clinical skills training.
KW - Student experience
KW - Student views
KW - Technical clinical skills
KW - Undergraduate medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065773052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40670-018-00657-2
DO - 10.1007/s40670-018-00657-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065773052
SN - 2156-8650
VL - 29
SP - 173
EP - 179
JO - Medical Science Educator
JF - Medical Science Educator
IS - 1
ER -