Evidence for a post-entry barrier to R5 HIV-1 infection of CD4 memory T cells

Annapurna Vyakarnam, J Eyeson, I Teo, M Zuckerman, K Babaahmady, H Schuitemaker, S Shaunak, T Rostron, S Rowland-Jones, G Simmons, P Clapham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: HIV-1 strains R5 and X4 can infect CD4 memory T cells in vivo. Anti-CD3/28 stimulation induces beta -chemokines and CCR5 down-regulation and renders these cells resistant to R5 HIV-1 infection. Here we describe an additional cellular mechanism that blocks productive R5 HIV-1 infection of CD4 memory T cells. Methods: Blood-derived CD4 memory T cells and CD4 T-cell clones were infected with primary R5 and X4 HIV-1 strains. Virus replication was correlated with CCR5 expression and beta -chemokine production. Virus entry and infectivity were measured by PCR for early and late products of HIV reverse transcription respectively. Results: R5 strains were up to 1000-fold less infectious than X4 viruses for CD4 memory T cells. This resistance was independent of CCR5 levels and of the Delta -32 mutation and the CCR2-V641/CCR5-59653T linked mutations. Blocking endogenous beta -chemokines relieved minimally this restriction. At the single cell level, CD4 memory cells were either permissive or non-permissive for R5 HIV-1 infection. R5 HIV titre was up to 10-fold lower than X4 virus titre even in a permissive clone. However, R5 viruses replicated as efficiently as X4 viruses in the permissive clone when neutralizing anti-beta chemokine antibodies were added. Non-permissive cells blocked a post-entry step of the virus life-cycle and expressed early but not late HIV transcripts. Neutralizing anti-beta chemokine antibodies promoted R5 virus replication marginally in the non-permissive clone. Conclusion: Some blood memory CD4 T cells retard R5 HIV-1 replication via endogenous beta -chemokines whereas others block productive R5 HIV-1 infection by an additional mechanism that interferes with a post-entry step of the virus life cycle. These natural barriers might contribute to lower pathogenicity of R5 HIV-1 strains for CD4 memory T cells than X4 viruses that emerge late in disease. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1613 - 1626
Number of pages14
JournalAids
Volume15
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sept 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for a post-entry barrier to R5 HIV-1 infection of CD4 memory T cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this