Abstract
The increasing variety of contingent work raises the question of how employers choose between various types of contractual arrangements. The authors review relevant Employment Relations and Strategic HRM literature and distinguish four types of contingent contracts along the dimensions of costs and control. They argue that employers are making choices based on cost and control constraints but are able to reshape these constraints through “institutional toying.” Their case study of a German manufacturing plant and R&D center illustrates the mechanisms of institutional toying, which are consistent with the literature on institutional loopholes and exit options. The article develops propositions that explain the diversity of contingent work arrangements and show how toying strategies enlarge the range of options available to employers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 715-738 |
Journal | ILR Review |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2021 |
Keywords
- contingent work
- employment relations
- labor market institutions
- strategic choice
- strategic HRM
- work organization