Human Tc1 and Tc2/Tc0 CD8 T-cell clones display distinct cell surface and functional phenotypes

M Vukmanovic-Stejic, B Vyas, P Gorak-Stolinska, A Noble, D M Kemeny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has recently become clear that distinct subsets of CD8 T cells, analogous to their CD4 counterparts, exist in rodents and humans. To examine functional differences between human CD8 T-cell subsets, we generated Tc1, Tc2, and Tc0 T-cell clones from the peripheral blood of healthy individuals. The majority of CD8 T-cell clones generated displayed a classic Tc1 phenotype, but 10% to 20% secreted interleukin (IL)-4 in addition to interferon-gamma (Tc0 phenotype). Generation of Tc2 clones was dependent on the use of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 as the primary stimulus. The cytokine profiles of established clones remained susceptible to modification by the addition of IL-12 and IL-4, In addition, IL-12 enhanced and IL-4 inhibited the growth of Tc1 but not Tc2/0 CD8 T-cell clones. Significant functional differences were observed between the subsets, Tc2/0 clones expressed CD30 and CD40 ligand at a much higher level than Tc1 clones. Both Tc1 and Tc2/0 clones showed comparable cytotoxicity and produced similar levels of perforin and Fas L, However, Tc2 clones were much more resistant to activation-induced cell death and less susceptible to apoptosis by direct Fas ligation. Moreover, Tc1 and Tc2 clones had opposing effects on the development of CD4 effecters, promoting type I and type 2 responses, respectively. These data provide evidence for profound differences between human CD8 T-cell subsets that may be important in their functions as cytotoxic or immunoregulatory cells. (C) 2000 by the American Society of Hematology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231 - 240
Number of pages10
JournalBlood
Volume95
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human Tc1 and Tc2/Tc0 CD8 T-cell clones display distinct cell surface and functional phenotypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this