Abstract
Background
Cervical cancer disproportionately affects women aged 65 years and older, especially those with inadequate previous screening. Speculum use is a key deterrent to screening attendance
in older women.
Aim
To assess whether offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling increase uptake among lapsed attenders aged 50-64.
Design and setting
Pragmatic randomised control trial conducted between August 2018 and November 2019 at 10 general practices in East London, UK.
Method
Participants were 784 women aged 50-64 last screened 6-15years before randomisation.
Intervention women received a letter offering the choice of a self-sampling kit or a clinician taken non-speculum sample. Control women received usual care. Main outcome measure: uptake within 4 months.
Results
Screening uptake 4 months after randomisation was significantly higher in the intervention arm: 20.4% (N=80/393) vs 4.9% (N=19/391, absolute difference=15.5%, 95%CI: 11.0%-20.0%, p<0.001). This was maintained at 12 months; 30.5% (N=120/393) vs 13.6% (N=53/391), respectively (absolute difference=17.0%, 95%CI: 11.3%-22.7%, p<0.001).
Conventional screening attendance within 12 months was very similar for both arms (intervention: 12.7% (N=50/393) vs control: 13.6% (N=53/391)). Ethnic differences were observed in screening modality preference. More white women opted for self-sampling (50.7%, N=38/75) while most Asian and Black women opted for conventional screening.
Conclusions
Offering non-speculum clinician-sampling and self-sampling substantially increases uptake in older women with lapsed screening attendance. Non-speculum clinician sampling appeals to women who dislike the speculum but prefer a clinician to take their sample and who lack confidence in self-sampling. Providing a choice of screening modality may be important for optimising cervical screening uptake.
Cervical cancer disproportionately affects women aged 65 years and older, especially those with inadequate previous screening. Speculum use is a key deterrent to screening attendance
in older women.
Aim
To assess whether offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling increase uptake among lapsed attenders aged 50-64.
Design and setting
Pragmatic randomised control trial conducted between August 2018 and November 2019 at 10 general practices in East London, UK.
Method
Participants were 784 women aged 50-64 last screened 6-15years before randomisation.
Intervention women received a letter offering the choice of a self-sampling kit or a clinician taken non-speculum sample. Control women received usual care. Main outcome measure: uptake within 4 months.
Results
Screening uptake 4 months after randomisation was significantly higher in the intervention arm: 20.4% (N=80/393) vs 4.9% (N=19/391, absolute difference=15.5%, 95%CI: 11.0%-20.0%, p<0.001). This was maintained at 12 months; 30.5% (N=120/393) vs 13.6% (N=53/391), respectively (absolute difference=17.0%, 95%CI: 11.3%-22.7%, p<0.001).
Conventional screening attendance within 12 months was very similar for both arms (intervention: 12.7% (N=50/393) vs control: 13.6% (N=53/391)). Ethnic differences were observed in screening modality preference. More white women opted for self-sampling (50.7%, N=38/75) while most Asian and Black women opted for conventional screening.
Conclusions
Offering non-speculum clinician-sampling and self-sampling substantially increases uptake in older women with lapsed screening attendance. Non-speculum clinician sampling appeals to women who dislike the speculum but prefer a clinician to take their sample and who lack confidence in self-sampling. Providing a choice of screening modality may be important for optimising cervical screening uptake.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- Cervical cancer
- screening
- Human papillomavirus
- self-sampling
- older women
- general practice