Abstract
Theories in fundamental physics are unlikely to be ontologically neutral, yet they may nonetheless fail to offer decisive empirical support for or against particular metaphysical positions. I illustrate this point by close examination of a particular objection raised by Wolfgang Pauli against Hermann Weyl. The exchange reveals that both parties to the dispute appeal to broader epistemological principles to defend their preferred metaphysical starting points. I suggest that this should make us hesitant to assume that in deriving metaphysical conclusions from physical theories we place our metaphysical theories on a purely empirical foundation. The metaphysics within a particular physical theory may well be the result of a priori assumptions in the background, not particular empirical findings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1046-1062 |
Journal | FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2015 |
Keywords
- Weyl
- Pauli
- Interpreting Physics
- continuum
- field concept