TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
AU - Wakely, Hannah
AU - Radakovic, Ratko
AU - Bateman, Andrew
AU - Simblett, Sara
AU - Fish, Jessica
AU - Gracey, Fergus
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the participants who took part in this research. This research formed part of a thesis project with the University of East Anglia (HW) which can be found on the university digital repository. The university provided a small budget used to purchase copies of the FrSBe. University of Essex (AB) provided funding for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Wakely, Radakovic, Bateman, Simblett, Fish and Gracey.
PY - 2022/3/2
Y1 - 2022/3/2
N2 - Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised self-rated version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R) within a non-clinical sample. Methods: The study was hosted online, with 140 participants completing the DEX-R, GAD-2 and PHQ-2. Sixty participants also completed the FrSBe, with 99 additionally completing the DEX-R again 3 weeks later. Correlations with demographic factors and symptoms of anxiety and depression were conducted. Rasch and factor analysis were also used to explore underlying subconstructs. Results: The DEX-R correlated highly with the FrSBe, indicating sound concurrent validity. Internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were excellent. Age and symptoms of depression and anxiety correlated with DEX-R scores, with older age associated with less dysexecutive problems. The Rasch analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of the rating scale, and a three-factor structure was found relating to activation-self-regulatory, cognitive and social-emotional processes. Frequencies of responses on DEX-R items varied, many were not fully endorsed indicating specific relevance of most but not all items to patients. Conclusion: Interpretations of DEX-R ratings of dysexecutive problems should consider mood and individual variation. Systematic comparison of DEX-R responses between healthy and clinical groups could help identify a suitable cut off for dysexecutive symptoms.
AB - Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised self-rated version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R) within a non-clinical sample. Methods: The study was hosted online, with 140 participants completing the DEX-R, GAD-2 and PHQ-2. Sixty participants also completed the FrSBe, with 99 additionally completing the DEX-R again 3 weeks later. Correlations with demographic factors and symptoms of anxiety and depression were conducted. Rasch and factor analysis were also used to explore underlying subconstructs. Results: The DEX-R correlated highly with the FrSBe, indicating sound concurrent validity. Internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were excellent. Age and symptoms of depression and anxiety correlated with DEX-R scores, with older age associated with less dysexecutive problems. The Rasch analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of the rating scale, and a three-factor structure was found relating to activation-self-regulatory, cognitive and social-emotional processes. Frequencies of responses on DEX-R items varied, many were not fully endorsed indicating specific relevance of most but not all items to patients. Conclusion: Interpretations of DEX-R ratings of dysexecutive problems should consider mood and individual variation. Systematic comparison of DEX-R responses between healthy and clinical groups could help identify a suitable cut off for dysexecutive symptoms.
KW - dysexecutive problems
KW - dysexecutive questionnaire-revised
KW - rating scales
KW - reliability
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126759691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126759691
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers In Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers In Human Neuroscience
M1 - 767367
ER -