Revisiting abstract argumentation frameworks

Sanjay Modgil*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper argues that many extensions of Dung's framework incorporating relations additional to binary attacks, are best viewed as abstractions of human rather than computational models of reasoning and debate. The paper then discusses how these additional relations may be reified into object level knowledge, thus enabling reconstruction of the extended framework as a Dung framework, and providing rational guidance for further reasoning and debate.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
Subtitle of host publicationSecond International Workshop, TAFA 2013, Beijing, China, August 3-5, 2013, Revised Selected papers
EditorsElizabeth Black, Sanjay Modgil, Nir Oren
PublisherSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Pages1-15
Number of pages15
Volume8306 LNAI
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-642-54373-9
ISBN (Print)978-3-642-54372-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Event2nd International Workshop on the Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation, TAFA 2013 - Beijing, China
Duration: 3 Aug 20135 Aug 2013

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume8306 LNAI
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Conference

Conference2nd International Workshop on the Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation, TAFA 2013
Country/TerritoryChina
CityBeijing
Period3/08/20135/08/2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting abstract argumentation frameworks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this