TY - JOUR
T1 - UPBEAT study patients' perceptions of the effect of coronary heart disease on their lives
T2 - a cross-sectional sub-study
AU - Smith, Alison
AU - Fortune, Zoe
AU - Phillips, Rachel
AU - Walters, Paul
AU - Lee, Geraldine A.
AU - Mann, Anthony
AU - Tylee, Andre
AU - Barley, Elizabeth A.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - BackgroundPatients can report positive effects of myocardial infarction. It is unknown whether these effects are sustained or what factors influence adaptation.ObjectivesTo explore primary care patients’ perceptions of the effect of coronary heart disease and to identify possible modifiable predictors of adaptation.Design and SettingCross-sectional, sub-study of UPBEAT cohort participants. Patients were recruited from coronary heart disease Registers in South London General PracticesMethod548 participants were asked “Has having heart disease changed your life? If so, was that change for the better, worse, both or neither?” Participants were asked to explain their response; explanations were subjected to content analysis. Associations between response and lifestyle, demographic, mood and coronary heart disease variables were tested.ResultsRespondents (394 male, 72%) were aged 27 to 98 years and had had heart disease for a mean of 12.4 SD ± 8.4 years. 120 (22%) reported that life was better and 200 (37%) said it was worse. The explanations of those who said ‘better’ were categorised as ‘Healthier Living’, ‘Recognised Mortality’ and ‘Stress Reduction’. For those saying ‘worse’, categories were ‘Restricted Lifestyle’, ‘Recognised Mortality’, ‘Loss and Burden’. More anxiety symptoms (RRR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12, 2.17), lower functional status (RRR 2.46, 95% CI 1.21, 4.98) and self-reported chest pain (RRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.77) were associated with saying ‘worse’.ConclusionsMany primary care patients are ambivalent to the effects of coronary heart disease, but some report positive effects. Negative perceptions are associated with reported functional impairment, chest pain and anxiety, but not illness severity or patient characteristics. Future work will track the implications of these perceptions, but nurses managing patients with coronary heart disease should consider these effects as they may be modifiable predictors of adaptation.
AB - BackgroundPatients can report positive effects of myocardial infarction. It is unknown whether these effects are sustained or what factors influence adaptation.ObjectivesTo explore primary care patients’ perceptions of the effect of coronary heart disease and to identify possible modifiable predictors of adaptation.Design and SettingCross-sectional, sub-study of UPBEAT cohort participants. Patients were recruited from coronary heart disease Registers in South London General PracticesMethod548 participants were asked “Has having heart disease changed your life? If so, was that change for the better, worse, both or neither?” Participants were asked to explain their response; explanations were subjected to content analysis. Associations between response and lifestyle, demographic, mood and coronary heart disease variables were tested.ResultsRespondents (394 male, 72%) were aged 27 to 98 years and had had heart disease for a mean of 12.4 SD ± 8.4 years. 120 (22%) reported that life was better and 200 (37%) said it was worse. The explanations of those who said ‘better’ were categorised as ‘Healthier Living’, ‘Recognised Mortality’ and ‘Stress Reduction’. For those saying ‘worse’, categories were ‘Restricted Lifestyle’, ‘Recognised Mortality’, ‘Loss and Burden’. More anxiety symptoms (RRR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12, 2.17), lower functional status (RRR 2.46, 95% CI 1.21, 4.98) and self-reported chest pain (RRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.77) were associated with saying ‘worse’.ConclusionsMany primary care patients are ambivalent to the effects of coronary heart disease, but some report positive effects. Negative perceptions are associated with reported functional impairment, chest pain and anxiety, but not illness severity or patient characteristics. Future work will track the implications of these perceptions, but nurses managing patients with coronary heart disease should consider these effects as they may be modifiable predictors of adaptation.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0020-7489
VL - N/A
SP - N/A
JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies
JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies
IS - N/A
M1 - N/A
ER -