User centered evaluation of EQUALS, a rule-based legal decision-aid

Padmaja Sasidharan; Claire Henderson; Graeme Lockwood; Jeroen Keppens; Andrew Ji Jones; Elaine Brohan

doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-131

User centered evaluation of EQUALS, a rule-based legal decision-aid

Padmaja Sasidharan^*, Claire Henderson, Graeme Lockwood, Jeroen Keppens, Andrew Ji Jones, Elaine Brohan

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference paper › peer-review

Abstract

EQUALS is the legal decision support component of a larger project to support individuals with mental health problems in employment or seeking employment. The decision-aid uses an interactive interview session to generate legal advice for its user. The EQUALS decision-aid was subjected to two rounds of user acceptance testing (UAT), with the assistance of domain experts. This paper discusses results from the UAT, based on which the potential and feasibility of legal decision aids are discussed.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Pages	131-134
Number of pages	4
Volume	259
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-131
Publication status	Published - 2013

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume	259
ISSN (Print)	09226389

Keywords

Legal Reasoning
Rule-based Decision Support Systems
UK Equality Act 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-131

Cite this

@inbook{6aa7cb1cd46446df807c674b1d1ec991,

title = "User centered evaluation of EQUALS, a rule-based legal decision-aid",

abstract = "EQUALS is the legal decision support component of a larger project to support individuals with mental health problems in employment or seeking employment. The decision-aid uses an interactive interview session to generate legal advice for its user. The EQUALS decision-aid was subjected to two rounds of user acceptance testing (UAT), with the assistance of domain experts. This paper discusses results from the UAT, based on which the potential and feasibility of legal decision aids are discussed.",

keywords = "Legal Reasoning, Rule-based Decision Support Systems, UK Equality Act 2010",

author = "Padmaja Sasidharan and Claire Henderson and Graeme Lockwood and Jeroen Keppens and Jones, {Andrew Ji} and Elaine Brohan",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-131",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781614993582",

volume = "259",

series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

pages = "131--134",

booktitle = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

}

User centered evaluation of EQUALS, a rule-based legal decision-aid. / Sasidharan, Padmaja; Henderson, Claire ; Lockwood, Graeme et al.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Vol. 259 2013. p. 131-134 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 259).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference paper › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - User centered evaluation of EQUALS, a rule-based legal decision-aid

AU - Sasidharan, Padmaja

AU - Henderson, Claire

AU - Lockwood, Graeme

AU - Keppens, Jeroen

AU - Jones, Andrew Ji

AU - Brohan, Elaine

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - EQUALS is the legal decision support component of a larger project to support individuals with mental health problems in employment or seeking employment. The decision-aid uses an interactive interview session to generate legal advice for its user. The EQUALS decision-aid was subjected to two rounds of user acceptance testing (UAT), with the assistance of domain experts. This paper discusses results from the UAT, based on which the potential and feasibility of legal decision aids are discussed.

AB - EQUALS is the legal decision support component of a larger project to support individuals with mental health problems in employment or seeking employment. The decision-aid uses an interactive interview session to generate legal advice for its user. The EQUALS decision-aid was subjected to two rounds of user acceptance testing (UAT), with the assistance of domain experts. This paper discusses results from the UAT, based on which the potential and feasibility of legal decision aids are discussed.

KW - Legal Reasoning

KW - Rule-based Decision Support Systems

KW - UK Equality Act 2010

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894557476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-131

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-131

M3 - Conference paper

AN - SCOPUS:84894557476

SN - 9781614993582

VL - 259

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 131

EP - 134

BT - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

ER -

User centered evaluation of EQUALS, a rule-based legal decision-aid

Abstract

Publication series

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this