TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)
AU - Williams, Julie Barbara
AU - Leamy, Mary Catherine
AU - Pesola, Francesca
AU - Bird, Victoria Jane
AU - Le Boutillier, Clair
AU - Slade, Mike Dominic
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Background Supporting recovery is the aim of national mental health policy in many countries. However, only one measure of recovery has been developed in England: the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR), which measures recovery from the perspective of adult mental health service users with a psychosis diagnosis. Aims To independently evaluate the psychometric properties of the 15-and 22-item versions of the QPR. Method Two samples were used: data-set 1 (n = 88) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months. Data-set 2 (n = 399; trial registration: ISRCTN02507940) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline and 1 year. Results For the 15-item version, internal consistency was 0.89, convergent validity was 0.73, test-retest reliability was 0.74 and sensitivity to change was 0.40. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 15-item version offered a good fit. For the 22-item version, the interpersonal subscale was found to underperform and the intrapersonal subscale overlaps substantially with the 15-item version. Conclusions Both the 15-item and the intrapersonal subscale of the 22-item versions of the QPR demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The 15-item version is slightly more robust and also less burdensome, so it can be recommended for use in research and clinical practice.
AB - Background Supporting recovery is the aim of national mental health policy in many countries. However, only one measure of recovery has been developed in England: the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR), which measures recovery from the perspective of adult mental health service users with a psychosis diagnosis. Aims To independently evaluate the psychometric properties of the 15-and 22-item versions of the QPR. Method Two samples were used: data-set 1 (n = 88) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months. Data-set 2 (n = 399; trial registration: ISRCTN02507940) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline and 1 year. Results For the 15-item version, internal consistency was 0.89, convergent validity was 0.73, test-retest reliability was 0.74 and sensitivity to change was 0.40. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 15-item version offered a good fit. For the 22-item version, the interpersonal subscale was found to underperform and the intrapersonal subscale overlaps substantially with the 15-item version. Conclusions Both the 15-item and the intrapersonal subscale of the 22-item versions of the QPR demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The 15-item version is slightly more robust and also less burdensome, so it can be recommended for use in research and clinical practice.
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161695
DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161695
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 207
SP - 551
EP - 555
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -